| Sunday, September 04, 2005 |
| Sunday Best: Why we couldn't save New Orleans |
Errol Lewis writing for the NY Daily News:
Bubbling up from the flood that destroyed New Orleans are images, beamed around the world, of America's original and continuing sin: the shabby, contemptuous treatment this country metes out, decade after decade, to poor people in general and the descendants of African slaves in particular. The world sees New Orleans burning and dying today, but the televised anarchy - the shooting and looting, needless deaths, helpless rage and maddening governmental incompetence - was centuries in the making.
To the casual viewer, the situation is an incomprehensible mess that raises questions about the intelligence, sanity and moral worth of those trapped in the city. Why didn't those people evacuate before the hurricane? Why don't they just walk out of town now? And why should anyone care about people who are stealing and fighting the police?
That hard, unsympathetic view is the traditional American response to the poverty, ignorance and rage that afflict many of us whose great-great-grandparents once made up the captive African slave labor pool. In far too many cities, including New Orleans, the marching orders on the front lines of American race relations are to control and contain the very poor in ghettos as cheaply as possible; ignore them completely if possible; and call in the troops if the brutes get out of line. ... (read the rest here)
WaPo talks nature's wrath, man's mistakes.
Paraphrasing the song I still can't get out of my head, Ann Rice asks: Do you know what it means to lose New Orleans?
Admittedly this is from earlier this week, but in case you missed it, Paul Krugman writes about our can't-do government |
posted by JReid @ 1:31 PM   |
|
|
|
|