... Thomas Frank. That's the name of the author of "What's the Matter With Kansas?" (ca 2004). I've been talking about his book in several posts so I might as well give him a plug by name. Here's an LA Times review:
One of “our most insightful social observers”* cracks the great political mystery of our time: how conservatism, once a marker of class privilege, became the creed of millions of ordinary Americans With his acclaimed wit and acuity, Thomas Frank turns his eye on what he calls the “thirty-year backlash”—the populist revolt against a supposedly liberal establishment. The high point of that backlash is the Republican Party’s success in building the most unnatural of alliances: between blue-collar Midwesterners and Wall Street business interests, workers and bosses, populists and right-wingers. In asking “what ’s the matter with Kansas?”—how a place famous for its radicalism became one of the most conservative states in the union—Frank, a native Kansan and onetime Republican, seeks to answer some broader American riddles: Why do so many of us vote against our economic interests? Where’s the outrage at corporate manipulators? And whatever happened to middle-American progressivism? The questions are urgent as well as provocative. Frank answers them by examining pop conservatism—the bestsellers, the radio talk shows, the vicious political combat—and showing how our long culture wars have left us with an electorate far more concerned with their leaders’ “values” and down-home qualities than with their stands on hard questions of policy. A brilliant analysis—and funny to boot—What’s the Matter with Kansas? presents a critical assessment of who we are, while telling a remarkable story of how a group of frat boys, lawyers, and CEOs came to convince a nation that they spoke on behalf of the People. -- Los Angeles Times
And a quote from Thomas Frank himself, which sums it up nicely (or that will get him into the same hot water as Barack Obama, if you leave it up to the lazy MSM:
"The problem is not that Democrats are monolithically pro-choice or anti-school prayer; it's that by dropping the class language that once distinguished them sharply from Republicans, they have left themselves vulnerable to cultural wedge issues like guns and abortion and the rest whose hallucinatory appeal would ordinarily be overshadowed by material concerns. We are in an environment where Republicans talk constantly about class -- in a coded way, to be sure -- but where Democrats are afraid to bring it up."
Uh ... duh...
The only difference between what Barack Obama said and what Thomas Frank said is that Barack Obama used the word "bitter" to describe disaffected lower-middle class white folks who vote primarily on "cultural" issues or who retreat to GOP-inspired positions on things like immigration "as a way to explain their frustrations." But the notion that many Americans are angry, indeed, bitter, about the state of the U.S. economy and their shrinking lot in life is clearly evidenced by EVERY FREAKING POLL IN THE KNOWN WORLD, and by previous polls that described a plurality of Americans as not just dissatisfied (8 in 10 are that), but angry; about Iraq (2004), about gas prices (2005), or hell, about just every damned thing (2006).
And before we let our TV news spokesmodels get into a further lather about Obama's supposed "big gaffe," let's have a look back, say, to 1994, when a certain president whose surname begins with "C" was in the White House. This, at the time, was a rather unremarkable headline, from the Virginian Pilot:
A NATION IN AN ANGRY MOOD A NEW POLL FINDS US INCREASINGLY BITTER, FRUSTRATED AND CYNICAL.
DATE: Wednesday, September 21, 1994
Americans are in an ugly mood, and that's a dangerous fact for politicians and others dependent on the kindness of strangers.
That's the bleak conclusion of a major new poll by the Times Mirror Center assessing the national political climate.
The survey paints a picture of an America that has become an increasingly bitter, frustrated, cynical and selfish place over the last seven years. And it portrays a public ever more distrustful and hopeless about its government.
``This is an electorate that is angry, self-absorbed and unanchored politically,'' said Andrew Kohut, director of the Times Mirror Center.
Among the grim details:
Americans are increasingly indifferent toward the problems of blacks and minorities and resentful toward immigrants.
Fewer Americans think government should take care of needy people.
Public disgust with Washington is significantly worse than in 1992. More voters want traditional politicians replaced with a fresh, new batch. And a third party is looking better all the time.
More than 70 percent of Americans think the media, especially television news shows, hurt the country more than they help.
The poll's analysts concluded that the Clinton administration's agenda of change and economic recovery have failed to reverse an overwhelming political cynicism in the country.
<%
dim done
done = request.form("done")
if done = "" then
done = "No"
%>
Tell a friend
<%
Else
if request.form("done") = "Yes" then
'sets variables
dim email, sendmail
email = request.form("email")
Set sendmail = Server.CreateObject("CDONTS.NewMail")
'put the webmaster address here
sendmail.From = "webmaster@aspbasics.com"
'The mail is sent to the address entered in the previous page.
sendmail.To = email
'Enter the subject of your mail here
sendmail.Subject = "Check out this website"
'send a specific page or send a site url
dim url
'url = Request.ServerVariables("HTTP_REFERER")
url = "http://www.aspbasics.net"
'This is the content of the message.
sendmail.Body = "Site recommendation from a friend!" & _
vbCrlf & vbCrlf & "A friend has sent you this email and thought you would should check out this site." & _
vbCrlf & url & vbCrlf
'this sets mail priority.... 0=low 1=normal 2=high
sendmail.Importance = 1
sendmail.Send 'Send the email!
response.redirect Request.ServerVariables("HTTP_REFERER")
'Response.write ("Sent to ") & email
End if
End if
%>
"[T]he practice of arbitrary imprisonments, have been, in all ages, the favorite and most formidable instruments of tyranny.' Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 84, August, 1788