If you read nothing else today, read this: notes from GOPer who fled the ‘cult’

20120818-200846.jpg

Stop me if you’ve read this before… I don’t know how I missed it when it was originally published, in September of last year (though maybe it was because it was scarcely mentioned in the media. I find almost no commentary about it online.) I’m not entirely surprised that the author, Mike Lofgren, wasn’t booked all over TV to talk about his 28 years as a staffer on the Republican House and Senate budget and other committees, often dealing with national security and defense issues, according to those D.C. journos who are very familiar with him. Lofgren’s critique of his own party, the Democrats and the media itself, is as thorough as it is devastating.

In short, Lofgren says the modern, post-Eisenhower GOP has morphed into a cult, led by plutocrats and their elected, media and faux intellectual minions, who have crafted an elaborate, continual ruse to serve the rich at all costs – even the cost of the country itself. And he explains how that cult recruited, and retains lower income, low information white Americans, and why they are pushing headlong to stop non-white/Christian/straight Americans from voting at all. (Hint: its partly Democrats’ fault for letting them do it unassailed.)

The piece is incredibly prophetic, touching on the very issues we are debating right now: Medicare, voter ID laws, and the Ayn Randism mixed with religious fundamentalism that defines the “modern” GOP. It is, to put it plainly, a must read. The author is clearly a Republican, and is no fan of Obama or Democrats. But his diagnosis of his own party’s pathologies, and his explanation of why he quit the business, is stunning and spot on.

A clip:

To those millions of Americans who have finally begun paying attention to politics and watched with exasperation the tragicomedy of the debt ceiling extension, it may have come as a shock that the Republican Party is so full of lunatics. To be sure, the party, like any political party on earth, has always had its share of crackpots, like Robert K. Dornan or William E. Dannemeyer. But the crackpot outliers of two decades ago have become the vital center today: Steve King, Michele Bachman (now a leading presidential candidate as well), Paul Broun, Patrick McHenry, Virginia Foxx, Louie Gohmert, Allen West. The Congressional directory now reads like a casebook of lunacy.

It was this cast of characters and the pernicious ideas they represent that impelled me to end a nearly 30-year career as a professional staff member on Capitol Hill. A couple of months ago, I retired; but I could see as early as last November that the Republican Party would use the debt limit vote, an otherwise routine legislative procedure that has been used 87 times since the end of World War II, in order to concoct an entirely artificial fiscal crisis. Then, they would use that fiscal crisis to get what they wanted, by literally holding the US and global economies as hostages.

The debt ceiling extension is not the only example of this sort of political terrorism. Republicans were willing to lay off 4,000 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) employees, 70,000 private construction workers and let FAA safety inspectors work without pay, in fact, forcing them to pay for their own work-related travel – how prudent is that? – in order to strong arm some union-busting provisions into the FAA reauthorization.

Lofgren also dings the media:

A couple of years ago, a Republican committee staff director told me candidly (and proudly) what the method was to all this obstruction and disruption. Should Republicans succeed in obstructing the Senate from doing its job, it would further lower Congress’s generic favorability rating among the American people. By sabotaging the reputation of an institution of government, the party that is programmatically against government would come out the relative winner.

A deeply cynical tactic, to be sure, but a psychologically insightful one that plays on the weaknesses both of the voting public and the news media. There are tens of millions of low-information voters who hardly know which party controls which branch of government, let alone which party is pursuing a particular legislative tactic. These voters’ confusion over who did what allows them to form the conclusion that “they are all crooks,” and that “government is no good,” further leading them to think, “a plague on both your houses” and “the parties are like two kids in a school yard.” This ill-informed public cynicism, in its turn, further intensifies the long-term decline in public trust in government that has been taking place since the early 1960s – a distrust that has been stoked by Republican rhetoric at every turn (“Government is the problem,” declared Ronald Reagan in 1980).

The media are also complicit in this phenomenon. Ever since the bifurcation of electronic media into a more or less respectable “hard news” segment and a rabidly ideological talk radio and cable TV political propaganda arm, the “respectable” media have been terrified of any criticism for perceived bias. Hence, they hew to the practice of false evenhandedness. Paul Krugman has skewered this tactic as being the “centrist cop-out.” “I joked long ago,” he says, “that if one party declared that the earth was flat, the headlines would read ‘Views Differ on Shape of Planet.’”

He hits the issue of voter disenfranchisement,too. As you read this, recall that Karl Rove engineered the firing of nearly a dozen U.S. attorneys during the Bush years, for one reason: they refused to gin up phony cases of voter fraud:

Undermining Americans’ belief in their own institutions of self-government remains a prime GOP electoral strategy. But if this technique falls short of producing Karl Rove’s dream of 30 years of unchallengeable one-party rule (as all such techniques always fall short of achieving the angry and embittered true believer’s New Jerusalem), there are other even less savory techniques upon which to fall back. Ever since Republicans captured the majority in a number of state legislatures last November, they have systematically attempted to make it more difficult to vote: by onerous voter ID requirements (in Wisconsin, Republicans have legislated photo IDs while simultaneously shutting Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) offices in Democratic constituencies while at the same time lengthening the hours of operation of DMV offices in GOP constituencies); by narrowing registration periods; and by residency requirements that may disenfranchise university students.

This legislative assault is moving in a diametrically opposed direction to 200 years of American history, when the arrow of progress pointed toward more political participation by more citizens. Republicans are among the most shrill in self-righteously lecturing other countries about the wonders of democracy; exporting democracy (albeit at the barrel of a gun) to the Middle East was a signature policy of the Bush administration. But domestically, they don’t want those people voting.

You can probably guess who those people are. Above all, anyone not likely to vote Republican. As Sarah Palin would imply, the people who are not Real Americans. Racial minorities. Immigrants. Muslims. Gays. Intellectuals. Basically, anyone who doesn’t look, think, or talk like the GOP base. This must account, at least to some degree, for their extraordinarily vitriolic hatred of President Obama. I have joked in the past that the main administration policy that Republicans object to is Obama’s policy of being black.[2] Among the GOP base, there is constant harping about somebody else, some “other,” who is deliberately, assiduously and with malice aforethought subverting the Good, the True and the Beautiful: Subversives. Commies. Socialists. Ragheads. Secular humanists. Blacks. Fags. Feminazis. The list may change with the political needs of the moment, but they always seem to need a scapegoat to hate and fear. …

…I do not mean to place too much emphasis on racial animus in the GOP. While it surely exists, it is also a fact that Republicans think that no Democratic president could conceivably be legitimate. Republicans also regarded Bill Clinton as somehow, in some manner, twice fraudulently elected (well do I remember the elaborate conspiracy theories that Republicans traded among themselves). Had it been Hillary Clinton, rather than Barack Obama, who had been elected in 2008, I am certain we would now be hearing, in lieu of the birther myths, conspiracy theories about Vince Foster’s alleged murder.

He then gets to the heart of the matter:

The reader may think that I am attributing Svengali-like powers to GOP operatives able to manipulate a zombie base to do their bidding. It is more complicated than that. Historical circumstances produced the raw material: the deindustrialization and financialization of America since about 1970 has spawned an increasingly downscale white middle class – without job security (or even without jobs), with pensions and health benefits evaporating and with their principal asset deflating in the collapse of the housing bubble. Their fears are not imaginary; their standard of living is shrinking.

What do the Democrats offer these people? Essentially nothing. Democratic Leadership Council-style “centrist” Democrats were among the biggest promoters of disastrous trade deals in the 1990s that outsourced jobs abroad: NAFTA, World Trade Organization, permanent most-favored-nation status for China. At the same time, the identity politics/lifestyle wing of the Democratic Party was seen as a too illegal immigrant-friendly by downscaled and outsourced whites.[3]

While Democrats temporized, or even dismissed the fears of the white working class as racist or nativist, Republicans went to work. To be sure, the business wing of the Republican Party consists of the most energetic outsourcers, wage cutters and hirers of sub-minimum wage immigrant labor to be found anywhere on the globe. But the faux-populist wing of the party, knowing the mental compartmentalization that occurs in most low-information voters, played on the fears of that same white working class to focus their anger on scapegoats that do no damage to corporations’ bottom lines: instead of raising the minimum wage, let’s build a wall on the Southern border (then hire a defense contractor to incompetently manage it). Instead of predatory bankers, it’s evil Muslims. Or evil gays. Or evil abortionists.

How do they manage to do this? Because Democrats ceded the field. Above all, they do not understand language. Their initiatives are posed in impenetrable policy-speak: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The what? – can anyone even remember it? No wonder the pejorative “Obamacare” won out. Contrast that with the Republicans’ Patriot Act. You’re a patriot, aren’t you? Does anyone at the GED level have a clue what a Stimulus Bill is supposed to be? Why didn’t the White House call it the Jobs Bill and keep pounding on that theme?

You know that Social Security and Medicare are in jeopardy when even Democrats refer to them as entitlements. “Entitlement” has a negative sound in colloquial English: somebody who is “entitled” selfishly claims something he doesn’t really deserve. Why not call them “earned benefits,” which is what they are because we all contribute payroll taxes to fund them? That would never occur to the Democrats. Republicans don’t make that mistake; they are relentlessly on message: it is never the “estate tax,” it is the “death tax.” Heaven forbid that the Walton family should give up one penny of its $86-billion fortune. All of that lucre is necessary to ensure that unions be kept out of Wal-Mart, that women employees not be promoted and that politicians be kept on a short leash.

It was not always thus. It would have been hard to find an uneducated farmer during the depression of the 1890s who did not have a very accurate idea about exactly which economic interests were shafting him. An unemployed worker in a breadline in 1932 would have felt little gratitude to the Rockefellers or the Mellons. But that is not the case in the present economic crisis. After a riot of unbridled greed such as the world has not seen since the conquistadors’ looting expeditions and after an unprecedented broad and rapid transfer of wealth upward by Wall Street and its corporate satellites, where is the popular anger directed, at least as depicted in the media? At “Washington spending” – which has increased primarily to provide unemployment compensation, food stamps and Medicaid to those economically damaged by the previous decade’s corporate saturnalia. Or the popular rage is harmlessly diverted against pseudo-issues: death panels, birtherism, gay marriage, abortion, and so on, none of which stands to dent the corporate bottom line in the slightest.

As I’m reading this, I’m thinking, “this is every conservative comment I read on Hot Air, or Redstate, or Mediaite, or on Twitter. The singularly focused rage against “others,” who are “un-American” or “ruining America” seems so misplaced, and liberals are just jumping out of their skins saying “no, look at the banks! What about the plutocrats! Don’t you get that they’re screwing you????” But we who are outsiders don’t speak their language – don’t understand their fears. That was what was s brlliant about Barack Obama’s famous “race speech” in 2008; he incorporated very frank discussion about the fears of working class white Americans, who have lost much, and don’t know quite who to blame. Republicans gave them someone to blame: immigrants, Muslims, gays, deadbeats who want or need food stamps and public assistance (though not the working class whites themselves, who “deserve” their federal aid…) and of course, Obama himself.

Later in the piece, Lofgren explains why he got out of the game:

I left because I was appalled at the headlong rush of Republicans, like Gadarene swine, to embrace policies that are deeply damaging to this country’s future; and contemptuous of the feckless, craven incompetence of Democrats in their half-hearted attempts to stop them. And, in truth, I left as an act of rational self-interest. Having gutted private-sector pensions and health benefits as a result of their embrace of outsourcing, union busting and “shareholder value,” the GOP now thinks it is only fair that public-sector workers give up their pensions and benefits, too. Hence the intensification of the GOP’s decades-long campaign of scorn against government workers. Under the circumstances, it is simply safer to be a current retiree rather than a prospective one.

If you think Paul Ryan and his Ayn Rand-worshipping colleagues aren’t after your Social Security and Medicare, I am here to disabuse you of your naiveté.[5] They will move heaven and earth to force through tax cuts that will so starve the government of revenue that they will be “forced” to make “hard choices” – and that doesn’t mean repealing those very same tax cuts, it means cutting the benefits for which you worked.

So prescient.

Ou simply must read the whole thing. It’s long, but it delves into the GOP’s belief system: their worship of the rich, their lust for war, and religious zealotry/scorn for science and reason. It’s called “Goodbye to All That: Reflections of a GOP Operative Who Left the Cult” and you can read it all at Truthout, where it was published n the 3rd of September, 2011.

And in the interest of fairness, here’s a thorough rebuttal of Lofgren, by a Republican. It mostly consists of accusations that Lofgren is slandering Republican voters and calling them stupid, and insinuations that the longtime GOP staffer might have rabies (“foaming a the mouth” is alleged.) and it doesn’t really get at the root of Lofgren’s critique, while also seeming to imply that Paul Ryan is among the “back benchers.” Heh. But I offer it as counterpoint nonetheless.

Happy reading!

This entry was posted in 2012, Politics, Republicans and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to If you read nothing else today, read this: notes from GOPer who fled the ‘cult’

  1. Bobbie D. Barnett says:

    I read rhis article with a great deal of interest. I totally agree with it and have felt this was the situation for many years. As a retired UNION Electrician I fear for the future of our Unions and all of the good they have done over the years. I am a fifty two year member and a Past officer of my LU, 816 IBEW, and the Kentucky AFL-CIO and fear for their future if the GOP gets any stronger.

  2. wolfshades says:

    Fantastic and horrific article: thanks very much for posting it. It’s really almost surreal, in the level of cynicism that would appear to be inherent in the political machine. The seeming crux of it is the exploitation of the self-preservation instinct upon which so many of us base our choices. Both parties would have you believe that demons abound everywhere. Oz incarnate, it seems, would rather we didn’t look behind the curtain.

    Where’s the hope in any of it? It almost seems that the riotous greedmongers have won: the choices presented are no choices at all. So the campaign to entice voters to stay at home is won before it has begun.

  3. eleanlor lukazewski says:

    What took you so long ? Every day the media tells us how much money each
    candidate raised.Hence the one with the most money gets to be president. There
    you have it ,EVERYTHING is trumped by money. The money that the 1%
    collect from the rest of us,either through taxes or fraud. Quit analyzing and
    whining get up and DO something. This has been going on for years. The middle
    class is not only being squeezed but more people are being shifted OUT of the
    middle class into poor and next to poverty. This is a race to the bottom.

  4. Robert Chaffee says:

    Saying these things since 1980 still elicits a blank stare from almost everyone I know. Still I wonder how it might be possible to counter the Luntz agenda with some equivalent and effectively destructive memes of their own. Sadly, the Democratic leaders do not know how to be mean.

  5. David Smith says:

    Thanks for publishing this. It’s interesting hearing this come from the belly of the beast, so to speak, but really nothing here should be surprising in the least to anyone who has paid more than minimal attention to the politics of destruction waged by the Republican party over the past 40 years. We are dealing with an American Taliban here.

    The question to me is why has this so escaped analysis and exposure by talented people in the media and, of course, the Democratic party. It’s as if they just could not comprehend that the paradigm had shifted and still continued to act as if the old rules applied. As much as I like Obama, I just can’t understand why he continued to play consensus politics in the face of an enemy so clearly intent on destroying his presidency at any cost to the country.

  6. Paul says:

    A great article but I find the use of the image of Ganesh, a very important god in the Hindu tradition, offensive. I’m sure many HIndu’s would as well. A bit more sensitivity is in order. Otherwise you’re acting just like the GOP would.

  7. F. Goodwin says:

    Excellent article; verifies my opinions of the downright tragedy that I watch on a daily basis. —a Party intent on bringing a President down that is willing to sink the country to meet its ends. I would have NEVER believed this could happen in this “exceptional” country. …that’s what we sell – “exceptionalism” while the world sees our VERY soiled laundry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>